Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO or Robomow RT300: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two robot lawn mowers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO
Main drawbackMaximum coverage restricts its fit for larger properties
Read the full analysis →
Robomow RT300
Main drawbackMaximum coverage limited to compact lawns
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Maximum area”Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO 9.2 / 10 vs 6.9
- Priority: “Maximum slope”Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO 9.1 / 10 vs 7.2
- Priority: “Cutting width”Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO 9.1 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority: “Equipment”Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO 9.1 / 10 vs 8.1
By criterion
| Criterion | Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO | Robomow RT300 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum area | 9.2 advantage | 6.9 |
| Maximum slope | 9.1 advantage | 7.2 |
| Cutting width | 9.1 advantage | 7.3 |
| Equipment | 9.1 advantage | 8.1 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO | Robomow RT300 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum area | 1600 m² | 300 m² |
| Maximum slope | 50% | 30% |
| Cutting width | 33 cm | 18 cm |
| Runtime | Not provided | 75 min |
| Charging time | Not provided | 3 h |
| Noise level | 62 dB | 69 dB |
| Navigation type | Wire-free | With perimeter wire |
| Connectivity | Mobile app | Bluetooth |
| Anti-theft alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Via app | Manual |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO
Leads on 4 criteria of 4 compared
- Maximum area: 9.2/10 vs 6.9/10 (1600 m² vs 300 m²)
- Maximum slope: 9.1/10 vs 7.2/10 (50% vs 30%)
- Cutting width: 9.1/10 vs 7.3/10 (33 cm vs 18 cm)
- Equipment: 9.1/10 vs 8.1/10
Robomow RT300
Leads on 0 criterion of 4 compared
- Navigation type: With perimeter wire
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO or Robomow RT300?
Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO scores 9/10, compared with 7.6/10 for Robomow RT300, using the same scoring criteria.
Which should you choose for a large area?
Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO wins on “Maximum area”: 9.2/10 compared with 6.9/10 for Robomow RT300. Recorded values: 1600 m² versus 300 m².
Which should you choose for sloping ground?
Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO wins on “Maximum slope”: 9.1/10 compared with 7.2/10 for Robomow RT300. Recorded values: 50% versus 30%.
Which wins on “Cutting width”?
Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO wins on “Cutting width”: 9.1/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Robomow RT300. Recorded values: 33 cm versus 18 cm.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO wins on “Equipment”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.1/10 for Robomow RT300.
What's the difference in navigation type between the two?
Ecovacs GOAT A1600 LiDAR PRO: Wire-free. Robomow RT300: With perimeter wire.