Head to head

Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m² or Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two robot lawn mowers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m², studio product shot

Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m²

7/10

Main drawbackMaximum slope limits its suitability to gentle terrain

Read the full analysis →
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500, studio product shot

Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500

9.1/10

Main drawbackMaximum coverage may exclude larger properties

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

Across all criteria, Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 scores higher (9.1 vs 7 out of 10).

  • Priority: “Maximum area”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9 / 10 vs 8
  • Priority: “Maximum slope”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.4 / 10 vs 6.6
  • Priority: “Cutting width”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.4 / 10 vs 6.7
  • Priority: “Runtime”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.1 / 10 vs 6.7
  • Priority: “Equipment”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.3 / 10 vs 7
  • Priority: “Value for money”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 8.3 / 10 vs 6.9

By criterion

Comparison of Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m² and Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 by criterion
Criterion Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m² Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500
Maximum area 8 9 advantage
Maximum slope 6.6 9.4 advantage
Cutting width 6.7 9.4 advantage
Runtime 6.7 9.1 advantage
Equipment 7 9.3 advantage
Value for money 6.9 8.3 advantage

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m² and Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500
SpecificationGardena smart SILENO sense 600 m²Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500
Maximum area600 m²1500 m²
Maximum slope25%80%
Cutting width16 cm40 cm
Runtime40 min113 min
Charging timeNot specified1,33 h
Noise levelNot provided64 dB
Navigation typeWire-freeCamera vision, Wire-free, RTK GPS
ConnectivityMobile appAmazon Alexa, Google Home, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi
Anti-theft alarmNoYes
SchedulingVia appVia app

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which is right for you?

Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m²

Leads on 0 criterion of 6 compared

  • Navigation type: Wire-free
View Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m² →

Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500

Leads on 6 criteria of 6 compared

  • Maximum slope: 9.4/10 vs 6.6/10 (80% vs 25%)
  • Cutting width: 9.4/10 vs 6.7/10 (40 cm vs 16 cm)
  • Runtime: 9.1/10 vs 6.7/10 (113 min vs 40 min)
  • Equipment: 9.3/10 vs 7/10
View Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 →

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m² or Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500?

Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 scores 9.1/10, compared with 7/10 for Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m², using the same scoring criteria.

Which should you choose for sloping ground?

Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Maximum slope”: 9.4/10 compared with 6.6/10 for Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m². Recorded values: 80% versus 25%.

Which wins on “Cutting width”?

Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Cutting width”: 9.4/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m². Recorded values: 40 cm versus 16 cm.

Which wins on “Runtime”?

Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Runtime”: 9.1/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m². Recorded values: 113 min versus 40 min.

Which wins on “Equipment”?

Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Equipment”: 9.3/10 compared with 7/10 for Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m².

Which should you choose for a large area?

Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Maximum area”: 9/10 compared with 8/10 for Gardena smart SILENO sense 600 m². Recorded values: 1500 m² versus 600 m².

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it