Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V or Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two robot lawn mowers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V
Main drawbackMaximum coverage centers on the garden around a house
Read the full analysis →
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500
Main drawbackMaximum coverage may exclude larger properties
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
Across all criteria, Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 scores higher (9.1 vs 8.3 out of 10).
- Priority: “Maximum area”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9 / 10 vs 8
- Priority: “Maximum slope”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.4 / 10 vs 8.1
- Priority: “Cutting width”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.4 / 10 vs 8.7
- Priority: “Equipment”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.3 / 10 vs 8.1
By criterion
| Criterion | Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V | Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum area | 8 | 9 advantage |
| Maximum slope | 8.1 | 9.4 advantage |
| Cutting width | 8.7 | 9.4 advantage |
| Runtime | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Equipment | 8.1 | 9.3 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V | Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum area | 600 m² | 1500 m² |
| Maximum slope | 40% | 80% |
| Cutting width | 22 cm | 40 cm |
| Runtime | 100 min | 113 min |
| Charging time | Not disclosed | 1,33 h |
| Noise level | 62 dB | 64 dB |
| Navigation type | Wire-free | Camera vision, Wire-free, RTK GPS |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth | Amazon Alexa, Google Home, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi |
| Anti-theft alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Via app | Via app |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V
Leads on 0 criterion of 5 compared
- Navigation type: Wire-free
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500
Leads on 4 criteria of 5 compared
- Maximum slope: 9.4/10 vs 8.1/10 (80% vs 40%)
- Equipment: 9.3/10 vs 8.1/10
- Maximum area: 9/10 vs 8/10 (1500 m² vs 600 m²)
- Cutting width: 9.4/10 vs 8.7/10 (40 cm vs 22 cm)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V or Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 scores 9.1/10, compared with 8.3/10 for Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V, using the same scoring criteria.
Which should you choose for sloping ground?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Maximum slope”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.1/10 for Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V. Recorded values: 80% versus 40%.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Equipment”: 9.3/10 compared with 8.1/10 for Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V.
Which should you choose for a large area?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Maximum area”: 9/10 compared with 8/10 for Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V. Recorded values: 1500 m² versus 600 m².
Which wins on “Cutting width”?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Cutting width”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.7/10 for Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V. Recorded values: 40 cm versus 22 cm.
What's the difference in navigation type between the two?
Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V: Wire-free. Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500: Camera vision, Wire-free, RTK GPS.