Head to head

Mammotion YUKA mini 600 or Worx WR168E: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two robot lawn mowers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Mammotion YUKA mini 600, studio product shot

Mammotion YUKA mini 600

8.4/10

Main drawbackLimited rated runtime constrains long mowing outings

Read the full analysis →
Worx WR168E, studio product shot

Worx WR168E

7.4/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackMaximum coverage restricted to small lawns

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority: “Maximum area”Mammotion YUKA mini 600 8 / 10 vs 6.6
  • Priority: “Maximum slope”Mammotion YUKA mini 600 8.7 / 10 vs 7.5
  • Priority: “Equipment”Mammotion YUKA mini 600 9.5 / 10 vs 7

By criterion

Comparison of Mammotion YUKA mini 600 and Worx WR168E by criterion
Criterion Mammotion YUKA mini 600 Worx WR168E
Maximum area 8 advantage 6.6
Maximum slope 8.7 advantage 7.5
Equipment 9.5 advantage 7
Value for money 8.5 8.5

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Mammotion YUKA mini 600 and Worx WR168E
SpecificationMammotion YUKA mini 600Worx WR168E
Maximum area600 m²250 m²
Maximum slope45%35%
Cutting width19 cmNot provided
Runtime55 minNot specified (unverified)
Charging time1,5 hNot provided
Noise level62 dB55,21 dB
Navigation typeArtificial intelligence, Camera vision, Wire-free, RTK GPSWith perimeter wire
ConnectivityAmazon Alexa, Google Home, Mobile app, Bluetooth, Wi-FiWi-Fi
Rain sensorYesYes

Values taken from the specifications table in each analysis; “Not provided”: no value found. “unverified”: among the 5 essential specifications (Maximum area, Maximum slope, Cutting width, Runtime, Navigation type), a value found online that no verified source (archived retailer page or manufacturer documentation) confirms. Other rows are not subject to this check.

Which is right for you?

Mammotion YUKA mini 600

Leads on 3 criteria of 4 compared

  • Equipment: 9.5/10 vs 7/10
  • Maximum area: 8/10 vs 6.6/10 (600 m² vs 250 m²)
  • Maximum slope: 8.7/10 vs 7.5/10 (45% vs 35%)
  • Navigation type: Artificial intelligence, Camera vision, Wire-free, RTK GPS
View Mammotion YUKA mini 600 →

Worx WR168E

Leads on 0 criterion of 4 compared

  • Navigation type: With perimeter wire
View Worx WR168E →

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, Mammotion YUKA mini 600 or Worx WR168E?

Mammotion YUKA mini 600 scores 8.4/10, compared with 7.4/10 for Worx WR168E, using the same scoring criteria.

Which wins on “Equipment”?

Mammotion YUKA mini 600 wins on “Equipment”: 9.5/10 compared with 7/10 for Worx WR168E.

Which should you choose for a large area?

Mammotion YUKA mini 600 wins on “Maximum area”: 8/10 compared with 6.6/10 for Worx WR168E. Recorded values: 600 m² versus 250 m².

Which should you choose for sloping ground?

Mammotion YUKA mini 600 wins on “Maximum slope”: 8.7/10 compared with 7.5/10 for Worx WR168E. Recorded values: 45% versus 35%.

What's the difference in navigation type between the two?

Mammotion YUKA mini 600: Artificial intelligence, Camera vision, Wire-free, RTK GPS. Worx WR168E: With perimeter wire.

Which offers better value for money?

They're neck and neck on “Value for money”: 8.5/10 for Mammotion YUKA mini 600, 8.5/10 for Worx WR168E. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage. This score compares each model's recorded price with the expected price for a model of the same standard, type and capacity range.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it