Robomow RT300 or Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two robot lawn mowers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Robomow RT300
Main drawbackMaximum coverage limited to compact lawns
Read the full analysis →
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500
Main drawbackMaximum coverage may exclude larger properties
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
Across all criteria, Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 scores higher (9.1 vs 7.6 out of 10).
- Priority: “Maximum area”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9 / 10 vs 6.9
- Priority: “Maximum slope”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.4 / 10 vs 7.2
- Priority: “Cutting width”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.4 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority: “Runtime”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.1 / 10 vs 8.5
- Priority: “Equipment”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.3 / 10 vs 8.1
By criterion
| Criterion | Robomow RT300 | Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum area | 6.9 | 9 advantage |
| Maximum slope | 7.2 | 9.4 advantage |
| Cutting width | 7.3 | 9.4 advantage |
| Runtime | 8.5 | 9.1 advantage |
| Equipment | 8.1 | 9.3 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Robomow RT300 | Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum area | 300 m² | 1500 m² |
| Maximum slope | 30% | 80% |
| Cutting width | 18 cm | 40 cm |
| Runtime | 75 min | 113 min |
| Charging time | 3 h | 1,33 h |
| Noise level | 69 dB | 64 dB |
| Navigation type | With perimeter wire | Camera vision, Wire-free, RTK GPS |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth | Amazon Alexa, Google Home, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi |
| Anti-theft alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Manual | Via app |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Robomow RT300
Leads on 0 criterion of 5 compared
- Navigation type: With perimeter wire
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500
Leads on 5 criteria of 5 compared
- Maximum slope: 9.4/10 vs 7.2/10 (80% vs 30%)
- Cutting width: 9.4/10 vs 7.3/10 (40 cm vs 18 cm)
- Maximum area: 9/10 vs 6.9/10 (1500 m² vs 300 m²)
- Equipment: 9.3/10 vs 8.1/10
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Robomow RT300 or Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 scores 9.1/10, compared with 7.6/10 for Robomow RT300, using the same scoring criteria.
Which should you choose for sloping ground?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Maximum slope”: 9.4/10 compared with 7.2/10 for Robomow RT300. Recorded values: 80% versus 30%.
Which wins on “Cutting width”?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Cutting width”: 9.4/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Robomow RT300. Recorded values: 40 cm versus 18 cm.
Which should you choose for a large area?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Maximum area”: 9/10 compared with 6.9/10 for Robomow RT300. Recorded values: 1500 m² versus 300 m².
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Equipment”: 9.3/10 compared with 8.1/10 for Robomow RT300.
Which wins on “Runtime”?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Runtime”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.5/10 for Robomow RT300. Recorded values: 113 min versus 75 min.