Worx WR168E or Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two robot lawn mowers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Worx WR168E
Main drawbackMaximum coverage restricted to small lawns
Read the full analysis →
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500
Main drawbackMaximum coverage may exclude larger properties
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Maximum area”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9 / 10 vs 6.6
- Priority: “Maximum slope”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.4 / 10 vs 7.5
- Priority: “Equipment”Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 9.3 / 10 vs 7
By criterion
| Criterion | Worx WR168E | Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum area | 6.6 | 9 advantage |
| Maximum slope | 7.5 | 9.4 advantage |
| Equipment | 7 | 9.3 advantage |
| Value for money | 8.5 | 8.3 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Worx WR168E | Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum area | 250 m² | 1500 m² |
| Maximum slope | 35% | 80% |
| Cutting width | Not provided | 40 cm |
| Runtime | Not specified (unverified) | 113 min |
| Charging time | Not provided | 1,33 h |
| Noise level | 55,21 dB | 64 dB |
| Navigation type | With perimeter wire | Camera vision, Wire-free, RTK GPS |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi | Amazon Alexa, Google Home, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi |
| Rain sensor | Yes | Yes |
Values taken from the specifications table in each analysis; “Not provided”: no value found. “unverified”: among the 5 essential specifications (Maximum area, Maximum slope, Cutting width, Runtime, Navigation type), a value found online that no verified source (archived retailer page or manufacturer documentation) confirms. Other rows are not subject to this check.
Which is right for you?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500
Leads on 3 criteria of 4 compared
- Maximum area: 9/10 vs 6.6/10 (1500 m² vs 250 m²)
- Equipment: 9.3/10 vs 7/10
- Maximum slope: 9.4/10 vs 7.5/10 (80% vs 35%)
- Navigation type: Camera vision, Wire-free, RTK GPS
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Worx WR168E or Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 scores 9.1/10, compared with 7.4/10 for Worx WR168E, using the same scoring criteria.
Which should you choose for a large area?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Maximum area”: 9/10 compared with 6.6/10 for Worx WR168E. Recorded values: 1500 m² versus 250 m².
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Equipment”: 9.3/10 compared with 7/10 for Worx WR168E.
Which should you choose for sloping ground?
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500 wins on “Maximum slope”: 9.4/10 compared with 7.5/10 for Worx WR168E. Recorded values: 80% versus 35%.
What's the difference in navigation type between the two?
Worx WR168E: With perimeter wire. Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500: Camera vision, Wire-free, RTK GPS.
Which offers better value for money?
They're neck and neck on “Value for money”: 8.5/10 for Worx WR168E, 8.3/10 for Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 1500. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage. This score compares each model's recorded price with the expected price for a model of the same standard, type and capacity range.